tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post2877731118417824399..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: AT ICCF-19 THINGS GETTING MORE INTERESTING THAN EXPECTEDGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-3286471772636267042015-04-13T11:35:58.269-07:002015-04-13T11:35:58.269-07:00Ah, Peter, that comment that is a letter to the Na...Ah, Peter, that comment that is a letter to the Nation, basically conspiracy theory, which assumes and asserts speculation as fact, with no substance linked so one can actually investigate, is a waste of your reader's time, if you don't place it in context.<br /><br />Not to assert the following as fact (it is standard Wikipedia anti-pseudoscience rant), it does have a more solid basis.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer%27s_water_fuel_cell<br /><br />As to Tesla and Colorado Springs:<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla#Colorado_Springs<br /><br />As to Etenne Lenoir and hydrogen as a fuel, Lenoir's work has been misrepresented. The use of hydrogen as a fuel is not controversial, and the author just uses this to fill out his claims. No suppression is alleged.<br /><br />The "Swiss scientist" is not named and I don't recognize the reference. Someone might.<br /><br />And then what you quoted. Is there any known example "today" if a university that lost funding because it allowed work on cold fusion? Cold fusion research is neglected, to be sure, but there are not "200 universities" that have shown cold fusion to "work." That implies practical demonstration, more than basic science.<br /><br />There is some level of suppression in the history of cold fusion, but it has been much exaggerated. There were incidents here and there. That's it.<br /><br />Abd ulRahman Lomaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14566271926809161923noreply@blogger.com