tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post2517844553288658017..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: APR 16, 2017 LENR CURRENT SIMPLIFIED ISSUEGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-1016529721175769542017-04-16T19:40:26.826-07:002017-04-16T19:40:26.826-07:00Quote from the lead article;-
"this steam w...Quote from the lead article;-<br /><br />"this steam was condensed and cooled at the JMP Plant (we still have to know exactly how, but it is not an impossible task)"<br /><br />"not an impossible task?" For one megawatt of steam heat per hour?<br />Well, previously maybe not, when we didn't know what was in the 'JMP Plant'. Although even then it was doubtful. But now the photos are available of inside the 'JMP Plant', (what a grand title for a mostly empty sea container), we can plainly see that there was nothing in it, except for a very rudimentary array of pipes. No fans, no reverse cycle heat pump, no waterfall, no nothing. Just some pipes. <br />Would that qualify as a 'Plant' in anyone's assessment? <br /><br />The pipe array shown does not have the capacity to dissipate anywhere near one megawatt of power. Specially since they are in a sealed container. <br />Why do cars and trucks have fans next to the radiator? <br />Why don't they just have a few pipes running across the front of the car? In fact, just put them in the boot and keep it all sealed up and tidy. It's because the heat has to go somewhere and a sealed container with pipes in it will not do the job. We are talking about one megawatt! One thousand of one bar electric radiators!<br />So, I think whatever else is stated in the above article, no matter how relevant it might be to a particular point, the whole argument is completely negated by the clear impossibility of disposing of the 1 MW of steam heat and dealing with it by the simple waiver of, "(we still have to know exactly how, but it is not an impossible task)".<br />In the sealed and confined space that we see in the photo, and with the equipment shown in the photo, I would say it is so close to an impossible task that any distinction is negligible. For the argument to remain coherent, some possible methods would have to be suggested.<br /><br />Pete, I think we can reliably take it that it IS an impossible task. The only solution I can see, there was no 1 megawatt of steam disposed of in that system. Consequently, if there was no megawatt of steam disposed of then there was no megawatt of steam produced. As soon as that is recognized the whole system becomes very simple and logical. I think that was immediately seen by all those who inspected it at the end of the so called 'test'. It would be blatantly obvious without going into flow rates of pumps or anything else, the glaring deficiency of the whole act being, where did the supposed one megawatt of heat go? Elephants just don't disappear. Neither does a megawatt of heat each and every every hour for a whole year. <br />If anyone has a solution for that problem then I think now is a good time to hear it, and then we can move onto pipe sizes and pump flow rates. Until then, that's where the argument has stalled.Pweethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09197878743499245329noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-72046047019092362582017-04-16T14:46:03.585-07:002017-04-16T14:46:03.585-07:00https://www.google.ca/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/3...https://www.google.ca/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/39610937sam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.com