tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post2228790472627542565..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: 05 NOV 2015, THE BABEL TOWER OF LENR THEORIES AND INFOGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-12907043437425373792015-11-09T16:03:55.684-08:002015-11-09T16:03:55.684-08:00I am concerned that the reply refuting this was ce...I am concerned that the reply refuting this was censored, permitting a criminal accusation made without proof, evidence or reason by an anonymous person to stand uncorrected. I am all for freedom of opinion but Tyy's comment was utterly worthless and should not have been published.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-57702483778166580612015-11-08T15:40:48.375-08:002015-11-08T15:40:48.375-08:00Not sure about that Axil, but Mills does give as a...Not sure about that Axil, but Mills does give as an example the case of electrons confined in superfluid helium in support of his claim that electrons are 2D extended distributions of charge that can change shape to form spheres.<br /><br />In superfluid helium the electrons form bubbles stabilised by the van der waals forces of the helium atoms and when irradiated can absorb photons that cause a reduction in radius. The experimenters interpreted their observations as the electrons breaking apart into fractional charges.<br /><br />I prefer Mills interpretation better. As far as I know no one has ever divided an electron, ever.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-48319643195209455192015-11-06T09:08:30.002-08:002015-11-06T09:08:30.002-08:00Randell Mills is a fraudster or a fool.Randell Mills is a fraudster or a fool.tyyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05296030725193206870noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-17740140997683493422015-11-05T19:34:42.806-08:002015-11-05T19:34:42.806-08:00R, Mills has made one mistake when looking at his ...R, Mills has made one mistake when looking at his experimental data. He does not understand that electrons can be confined in nanocavities that produce electron orbits that decrease in size as energy is added to that system. An electron does not need a proton to orbit, it can be confined in an enclosure, a black box. This is the essence of the artificial atom.<br /><br />But when the electron and photon entangle, when energy is added to that system, the wavelength of the polariton shortens to such a point that EUV light is produced. This high frequency light is what has confused R. Mills. He does not understand that confinement of polaritons in a nanocavity can produce black light. <br /><br />All the experimental findings that Mills has produced over the years are a result of nanoplasmonics.Axilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07190120527431077518noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-73837197991109262992015-11-05T16:26:28.736-08:002015-11-05T16:26:28.736-08:00Perhaps the greatest difficulty lies in the refusa...Perhaps the greatest difficulty lies in the refusal to accept the possibility that there is little or no nuclear activity going on in a large and diffuse number of experimental systems classed by their experimenters as LENR systems. Dr. Randell Mills has provided a completed unified theory of matter, energy and spacetime that provides a reproducible production of heat and energy from "hydrinos" that is non-nuclear , yet it is proponents of LENR that vehemently reject his findings because it does not support nuclear activity, instead providing a source of energy from a reduction of the electrons radius close to the proton.<br /><br />The theory upon which the hydrino is based, repeatedly experimentally verified, explains most, if not all outstanding mysteries of the Universe:<br /><br />What is dark matter? Hydrinos or reduced radius hydrogen that is stable to radiation and hence not visible.<br /><br />Does dark energy exist? No, Universal expansion is a consequence of the conservation of spacetime during matter to energy conversion<br /><br />What is gravity? A consequence of the positive curvature of matter that corrects and conserves spacetime when energy is converted into matter resulting in a gravitational field.<br /><br />Was there a Big Bang? No. The Universe contracts and expands eternally depending on the dominant rates of energy to matter and matter to energy.<br /><br />Why is there matter/antimatter asymmetry? During Universal contraction the dominant type of neutrino superimposes with a photon to form only 1 type of neutron without its antiparticle which decays to a proton, electron and neutrino. Hence the Universe is matter filled, predominantly with hydrogen.<br /><br />Why does the Sun's corona appear 3 orders of magnitude hotter than the sun's surface? Fusion reactions in the sun's core provide the energy to ionise the sun's atmosphere into a proton and electron plasma. These particles are separated by ExB drift into magnetic pockets of like particles which on reconnection form dense pockets of atomic hydrogen that catalyse hydrino reactions that pump energy into the corona and fuel the solar wind. These reactions have already been imaged by solar cameras such as Hi-C and have variously been called "nanoflares" or "bright EUV dots".<br /><br />Why cant we calculate the ionisation energies of atoms and ions precisely? You can and the theory has already done this using nothing more than fundamental constants and integer values.<br /><br />I could go on but it is easier to read the theory in its book form for yourself.<br /><br />http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/book/book-download/<br /><br />using the free djvu software here:<br /><br />http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/book/book-download/download-instructions/<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com