tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post219222881628848557..comments2024-03-27T21:35:04.988-07:00Comments on EGO OUT: JUNE 25, 2016 LENR COMMENTS, INFO, MORE FROM SOCHIGeorgina Popescuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04628821029016016988noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-46108925377809530692016-12-11T10:04:07.834-08:002016-12-11T10:04:07.834-08:00$$$ GENUINE LOAN WITH 3% INTEREST RATE CONTACT US ...$$$ GENUINE LOAN WITH 3% INTEREST RATE CONTACT US FOR MORE DETAILS $$$.<br />Are you looking for a loan to clear off your dept and start up your own Business? have you being going all over yet not able to get a legit loan Company that will loan you? Here is your final solution, We can give you any amount you need provided you are going to pay back within the period of time given without any problem. Apply now and contact us for more details via email below.<br />Email: jubrinunityfinancialloan@gmail.com<br /><br />Application For loan.<br />First Name:<br />Last Name:<br />Date Of Birth:<br />Address:<br />Sex:<br />Phone No:<br />City:<br />Zip Code:<br />State:<br />Country:<br />Nationality:<br />Occupation:<br />Monthly Income:<br />Amount Needed:<br />Duration:<br />Purpose of the loan:<br />E-mail address:<br /><br />Email: jubrinunityfinancialloan@gmail.comLoanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03144894712150321430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-73577663326560761492016-06-29T08:57:39.989-07:002016-06-29T08:57:39.989-07:00Hi Peter,
Thank you for advertising my paper, whic...Hi Peter,<br />Thank you for advertising my paper, which I recently loaded on Academia.<br />A friend of mine spotted your mentioning of my paper, but told me that link on this page is not working.<br />The right one should be this one:<br />http://www.academia.edu/download/46714193/Calaon-Yet_Another_LENR_Theory_-_Electron-mediated_Nuclear_Reactions_EMNR.pdf<br /><br />Cheers<br />Andrea<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14619552685092987243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-66752995236246556872016-06-26T19:27:35.733-07:002016-06-26T19:27:35.733-07:00You have not seen the data, so you have no basis t...You have not seen the data, so you have no basis to be convinced. Or not convinced. This is a technical issue. Opinions don't count. Everything hinges on flow rates, temperatures, instrument specifications, and so on. Based on these factors, experts at I.H. concluded that the reactor is not producing any excess heat. I am far less capable than those experts, but to the best of my ability, looking at a sample of that data, I too reached that conclusion.<br /><br />You, Peter Gluck and everyone else will have to wait to see the data, and also the analysis of it from Rossi and from I.H. You cannot decide anything until then. You cannot even have an opinion. The rules of engineering and science say that every judgement must be grounded in facts, and you have no facts.<br /><br />I think it is a grave mistake for Peter to assume he knows what is going on, and to assume that Rossi is right in this dispute, and that I.H. and I are lying. Since he has no facts, this reaction is purely emotional. It is irrational. Since he has no engineering details, he trots out all kinds of half-baked notions about business contracts, or the timing of announcements, or he quotes lies spread by Rossi -- as if you can draw a technical conclusion from such fluff! It is pathetic.<br /><br />Peter is wrong. He will regret it if the facts are ever revealed. In science, you must never let your emotions or wishful thinking overrule rational, objective, fact-based analysis.<br />Jed Rothwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00179077151947615762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-29554736924861243432016-06-26T08:44:54.024-07:002016-06-26T08:44:54.024-07:00Jed
You are convinced the test is a failure but i ...Jed<br />You are convinced the test is a failure but i am not.<br />I am convinced that AR and TD did not work well together.<br />I like your opinions and the conversation that comes from them.<br />Regards<br />Samsam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-40015959447150888782016-06-26T02:06:20.032-07:002016-06-26T02:06:20.032-07:00Thank you, the idea has cahances to be relly impor...Thank you, the idea has cahances to be relly important. I think you knwo my 1992 paper "Topology is the key..." and you know my "Six Pillars of LENR+" on this blog. If you wish we can discus the issue in private...<br />peter<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-15629547278398726202016-06-26T02:00:13.067-07:002016-06-26T02:00:13.067-07:00Dear Sam,
Unfortunately that discussion is not ab...Dear Sam,<br /><br />Unfortunately that discussion is not about real data.<br />Thank you for the second document I have no problems with finding insult but I will not go at the low level used by my detractors.<br />peterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-27531781960021278192016-06-25T18:16:41.926-07:002016-06-25T18:16:41.926-07:00Peter,
Your idea that the temperature-enhanced mob...Peter,<br />Your idea that the temperature-enhanced mobility of surface atoms (or bulk vacancies near the surface) may play a role is very interesting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-61074272139604096352016-06-25T18:15:33.467-07:002016-06-25T18:15:33.467-07:00Peter,
Your idea that the temperature-enhanc...Peter,<br /> Your idea that the temperature-enhanced mobility of surface atoms (or bulk vacancies near the surface) may play a role is very interesting. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-37127032795007207262016-06-25T18:10:26.843-07:002016-06-25T18:10:26.843-07:00Jed,
I don't understand why you keep us...Jed,<br /> I don't understand why you keep using emotionally charged words such as "angry", since my impression is that the only one who is angry is yourself. In the meanwhile, it's sad that you seem to find it necessary to constantly repeat the same things. If you're right that Rossi is a fraud, I'm sure that we will find out soon enough, given the lawsuit between Rossi and IH as well as Rossi's plans to sell additional E-cats as well as QuarkX's in the near future. BTW, my main concern is not any particular agreement or lack of agreement between Rossi and IH, but rather the further development of LENR. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-81580773065128129912016-06-25T17:56:41.414-07:002016-06-25T17:56:41.414-07:00The March 10 statement seems clear to me. It says,...The March 10 statement seems clear to me. It says, "We value credibility through sound LENR research. That’s why any claims made about technologies in our portfolio should only be relied upon if affirmed by Industrial Heat and backed by reputable third parties who have verified our results in repeated experiments."<br /><br />What confuses you about that? They mean you should not believe Rossi until they concur. That was before Rossi announced his results. They were warning the public that they disagreed.<br /><br />I.H. has no obligation to tell anyone anything about their research. Whether they think a project succeeded, or failed, they can keep it secret. We should thank them for telling us anything about Rossi's test.<br /><br />If Rossi had not filed the lawsuit against them, they might never have revealed anything.<br /><br />You seem to think there is something unethical about keeping secrets. I have the opposite view. Unless I think someone is committing a crime, I never reveal a secret. (If I thought something is a crime, I would report it to the police.) I am not Steve Krivit.<br /><br />I know about dozens of experiments, both successes and failures. I have hundreds of papers that I will never upload, because the authors asked me not to. I have known about some experiments for years, and I have not said one word about them. When researchers ask me not to talk about something, for any reason, I NEVER, EVER, TALK ABOUT IT. Period.<br /><br />You can be sure that I would never have revealed anything I know about Rossi without first discussing it with I.H., or with Rossi himself.<br /><br />Rossi is not all that important. The 1-year test was a failure. You need to deal with that fact and move on. Stop being angry about it. Stop blaming the messenger (me). Your dream of high powered, Rossi-style cold fusion was a illusion. It was a mistake. But cold fusion is still real, and others are making progress, so take heart.Jed Rothwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00179077151947615762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-72874043803592465402016-06-25T17:31:05.235-07:002016-06-25T17:31:05.235-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Jed Rothwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00179077151947615762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-42200318440804542902016-06-25T13:00:42.154-07:002016-06-25T13:00:42.154-07:00feb 17feb 17Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-59185480148443698892016-06-25T13:00:11.764-07:002016-06-25T13:00:11.764-07:00fast answer late here
the END OF THE PROJECT was o...fast answer late here<br />the END OF THE PROJECT was on Feb7, the IH announcement of March 10 just alludes to possible problems does not speak about failure the test became a failure when the Trial was started by Rossi- April 8 if I remember correctly<br />peterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-88583859006719564872016-06-25T12:19:26.978-07:002016-06-25T12:19:26.978-07:00You wrote: "Nobody was surprised by the negat...You wrote: "Nobody was surprised by the negative results- the surprise was their timing and the frame in which this information was delivered."<br /><br />Why are you surprised by the timing and frame of the announcement? I.H. waited until the end to the test to announce the results. As I said, right to the end they hoped Rossi would correct his mistakes and produce a good result. So did I. If they had announced midway through the project that things were going badly, Rossi might have gotten upset, or he might have quit. They wanted to give him every opportunity to succeed.<br /><br />This is normal, ethical and not surprising. They handled the situation well. In any case, most corporations announce results at the end of a project, not midway through.<br /><br />There was nothing wrong with the frame, either. It was press release, copied to Infinite Energy, LENR-CANR.org, and other places. Why do you think these are inappropriate?<br /><br />You are angry about things that you have no reason to be angry about. I.H. did nothing wrong by withholding this information. On the contrary, it was good for cold fusion, since it gave Rossi every chance, right to the very end. If he had done the test properly and gotten excess heat, they would have paid him $89 million, and all would be well. It is not I.H.'s fault that the test failed to produce any excess heat.Jed Rothwellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00179077151947615762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-326167780677397310.post-50177987284673801432016-06-25T10:56:57.579-07:002016-06-25T10:56:57.579-07:00Peter
Disregarding Jed's insults can you give ...Peter<br />Disregarding Jed's insults can you give me<br />your opinion of the discussion going on with<br />Jed on Ecat world.Good,Bad,Some Good,<br />Some bad Thanks<br />http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/06/21/jed-rothwell-on-an-unpublished-e-cat-test-report-that-looks-like-it-worked/#comment-2749096266<br />Here is another link also if you and Jed have another Q/A.<br /><br />https://www.google.ca/search?client=safari&channel=iphone_bm&q=funny+insults+quotes&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiincnA0cPNAhUG4YMKHdXOB8gQ1QIIaygG&biw=320&bih=529&dpr=2<br />Sam<br />sam northhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13268558018307793474noreply@blogger.com